Over $950 Million in Verdicts and Recoveries
WWF Pays $18M, Agrees To Review Stunt Safety
Missouri Lawyers Weekly

1/29/2001

What gives a plaintiffs' lawyer the most professional and personal satisfaction, especially in a case involving great tragedy? Attorneys will say it's not notoriety, or money, or even the thrill of victory- it's knowledge that a lawsuit has brought about positive social change which will protect lives in the future.

That was one of the consolations Gary C. Robb and Anita Porte Robb took from the death of wrestler Owen Hart during a World Wrestling Federation match in May 1999.

The two lawyers represented Hart's family in their wrongful death case against the WWF following the accident at Kemper Arena in Kansas City.

Hart was a rising star known in the wrestling world as the Blue Blazer. As part of a pay-per-view television event, the WWF rigged Hart with a harness so he could make a stunt entry from a catwalk 78 feet above the ring.

The harness unexpectedly opened, however, causing Hart to plunge to the floor below. His aorta was severed, and he died on the arena floor several minutes later.

In their 46-count petition, the plaintiffs claimed that the WWF was negligent in failing to provide safe and proper equipment for the stunt. The manufacturers of the harness and cable system and the individuals who rigged the stunt were also named as defendants.


"The Hart Family takes some measure of comfort in knowing that other wrestlers will not be subjected to the same kind of risky stunts which claimed Owen's life"-Gary C. Robb


After extensive discovery by the Robbs, who took over 50 depositions across the country and in Canada and England, the WWF made an initial offer of $17 million to settle the case. Following mediation, the plaintiffs accepted an offer of $18 million, which was approved in its entirety by a Jackson County circuit judge on Nov. 7, 2000.

The settlement agreement also ended litigation brought by the Hart family against the city of Kansas City, WWF principals Vince and Linda McMahon, and two stunt riggers.

According to Gary Robb, the most important outcome of the case was the changes made by the WWF in connection with its stunt policies.

"The Hart family takes some measure of comfort in knowing that other wrestlers won't be subjected to the kinds of risky stunts which claimed Owen's life," Robb said.

"We applaud the WWF and Vince McMahon for now hiring a full-time stunt safety coordinator," he said.

Venue War

Before the case was resolved, the motion battle regarding venue and choice of law was particularly intense. The WWF filed a declaratory judgment action in federal court in Bridgeport, Conn., to have the dispute settled under Connecticut law, arguing that Hart's contract required it and because the WWF was headquartered there.

But the Robbs successfully argued that venue was proper in Missouri because the act occurred in Missouri and the witnesses were located in the state. Gary Robb pointed out that Hart's family was not a party to the contract and that they would not have been able to obtain personal jurisdiction over some of the defendants in Connecticut.

Another important factor in the plaintiffs' success was the stable of experts retained by the Robbs. Their experts included Manny Chavez, chief of safety for Walt Disney World Enterprises, and three stunt and rigging experts. Anita Robb said that retaining such people early on was an important strategy in the case because the plantiffs were able to "pretty much preempt the field."

In fact she noted that the defendants had not identified any experts at the time of settlement.

"It was necessary to identify early on the best experts out there because in some industries there are only two or three such people," she said.

She added that the plaintiffs' experts had performed stunt design for celebrities such as Madonna, Elton John and Sandy Duncan in Peter Pan, and were acknowledged to be tops in their field.

"They were absolutely essential to the lawsuit in a couple of respects. First, they understood all of the pressures in the stunt industry, and also their level of outrage about what had happened transcended a lot of the case," she said.

Consultant

Gary Robb said it was also helpful in this case to hire a non-testifying consultant to bring the attorneys up to speed on the world of professional wrestling."I had little to no knowledge of professional wrestling before the case," he said.

"This proved to be an extremely valuable strategy in helping us learn the players and leading us to our experts," Robb pointed out.



Robb credited his firm's policy on settlements for the favorable outcome of the Hart litigation."We never accept a case that we're not prepared to take to trial," he said. "Too many lawyers accept cases hoping for settlement."

He noted that a $17 million offer was rejected before the WWF proposed the $18 million settlement.

When asked how he and his partner could recommend rejection of a $17 million cash settlement in this case - just as they rejected a $12 million pretrial offer in Barnett v. Turbomeca and a $13 million pretrial offer in Sayles v. Vancom (which settled for $14 million) - Robb responded, "There's no magic formula.

"While a lawyer must always consider the risks of losing at trial, the evidence of defendants' liability in these particular cases was simply overwhelming," he said.

"In such instances, we firmly believe that the defendant must pay a premium in settlement to avoid the risk of a higher jury verdict at trial."




« Back to News & Media

The firm's lawyers are proud to be members of:
Telephone: 816-474-8080
Facsimile: 816-474-8081
TollFree: 1-800-474-1339
Nationwide practice in states including:
Alabama
Arkansas
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Illinois
Iowa
Kentucky
Minnesota
Missouri
Nebraska
Nevada
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Wisconsin

Personal Injury Lawyers - Kansas City, Missouri

Personal injury is an area of law that pertains to the injury of an individual. Both physical and emotional injuries fall into this branch of tort law. A personal injury lawyer is generally involved in cases where an injury has occurred due to the negligence of another party.

Examples of cases that a personal injury lawyer in Kansas City, Missouri can assist with include workplace accidents, falling or other accidents in the home, premises liability, defective and hazardous product cases, and dental and medical malpractice cases. If negligence on behalf of another party can be proved in court, compensation may be awarded.

Personal injury attorneys can also assist with industrial disease cases that may include respiratory diseases or a decline in health due to hazardous occupational conditions. These and other medical cases are often very complex, and it is advised that all aspects of the claim be handled by an experienced attorney.

Wrongful Death Lawyers - Kansas City, Missouri

Wrongful death falls under the common law jurisdictions wherein a person may be held liable for a death. It is important to note that wrongful death is the only course of legal action in which a company, rather than an individual, is at fault for a death.

In Kansas City, Missouri, cases involving wrongful death accidents require a preponderance of evidence as the standard of proof. Generally, the suit is filed by close relatives.

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merits.

Robb & Robb LLC One Kansas City Place, Suite 3900 - 1200 Main Street , Kansas City , Missouri 64105

Telephone: 816-474-8080 Facsimile: 816-474-8081 Toll Free: 1-800-474-1339